Monday, September 7, 2015

Readers: Failure to close the Ringhals prematurely – New Technology

       

On Friday came the news that the Ringhals Board stops the necessary investments in both reactors 1 and 2 at the Ringhals nuclear power plant. Thus they will not be able to operate beyond 2020, which means closing system five years earlier than previously planned.

Wrong decision the Ny Teknik reader. In a web survey answered by more than 2600 readers say 79 percent that it is wrong to close the reactors ahead of schedule.

The signature “Mr. squawk “dare not think about the consequences of closing the Ringhals 1 and 2 and Oskarshamn 1 and 2:

” Wind and solar are not solution. When the need is greatest during the icy winter and Sweden’s consumption is on the 28000MWh, how can we get coverage for the need? From our neighboring countries? Should we sectioning off areas of the country in 3 hrs. interval according to plan? Or is it where Finnish nuclear power comes into the picture? “

” For me it is natural for Sweden to be self-sufficient in energy production. ” believes “John”.

Energy storage believes “AL” is not a solution.

“Väl functioning storage at the Mirage is also for me a wet dream. Unfortunately, so far, and probably for the foreseeable future just a dream. “

“Ögonöppnaren” recalls that Germany close its nuclear power prematurely, and writes that: “Nuclear power will be a very brief parenthesis in the history of energy. “

” El Nino “will take up the implications for basic industry:” For the Swedish bass and process industries and our competitiveness needed safe / reliable and “cheap” electricity. Nuclear power will be the energy source with the highest efficiency level as “input device”. Hardly realistic to sun, wind and water in a safe and operating economically reasonable way to replace the loss of these two units. “

“Andreas” writes that wind and hydro power cover up: “The two reactors correspond if I remember correctly, half of effektutaget from wind power.” Well if it is not blow then? “. Then you drive wind power instead, for each KW coming in from wind power can save a KW in reservoirs for use when it is really needed.”

Will it require new hydroelectric turbines? No, according to the “solos”:

“There is no need for new water turbines. Wind power is predictable and varies considerably slower than most of the loads on the network “.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment